Moving forward. New posts will only be made to the blog on our main website - www.hivbenefits.co.uk
We welcome you to the new site. It has a search feature that should help you to find the information more readily.
John.

We have updated the letter you can send your MP - click here. Even if you have written before please continue to raise this issue, especially relevant in the current climate.
You can find your MP by typing your post code in to this website.
Picked up from the Benefits & Work website forums I thought is was worth highlighting this article - "Is Labour abolishing illness"- from The New Statesman for all visitors here to read.
Written by "Alison Ravetz is a professor emeritus of Leeds Metropolitan University who writes on housing policy and welfare reform"
The article can be found at http://www.newstatesman.com/200805010024
If you claim any benefit now. Given the current political climate where the government maybe more receptive to the issues you face. It is a good idea to remind your MP of the issues you face living with HIV.
If you don't claim any benefits at the present time. What is being allowed to happen today. May affect you in the future should you find yourself in the situation where you need to claim for benefits.
Either way, please write to your local MP if only to raise the issues facing all of us who live with this illness. Problems with benefits, loss of the 10p starting rate of tax or any issues you face trying to maintain full time employment.
You can find your MP by clicking here.
This web site will also tell you how your MP votes on certain issues. It maybe of interest for when you next vote.
As you may have gathered from previous posts. I have been greatly concerned that during the review process. If you list several specialist consultants that deal with other medical issues you have developed alongside or by virtue of your HIV, especially mental health issues. The DWP typically only approach your HIV Consultant. Where they will not wait for this report they may approach your GP. Therefore only one aspect of your health is evidenced.
I was also concerned. Minded of the DWP guidance & that Mental Health issues were seemingly being ignored.
In my case. I have engaged in correspondence questioning the DBD551 I submitted. Specifically how or why a decision could be reached without medical reports covering ALL my health issues from ALL my consultants.
The response states;
"..... decisions are made based on a persons mobility and care needs and not the disability itself"
so why require any medical report if it is not required to reach a judgement on entitlement?
it then continues;
"You state that I implied that mental health would not be considered part of your current disabilities - this was not my intention. It is fully accepted that the facts you present with regard to your mental health are accurate and correct. You are quite right to say that not to approach other consultants you have mentioned would not give a complete picture of your HIV."
The Decision Maker then states she is to seek additional medical reports from my other consultants.
Why is this important?
Your HIV consultant or GP may refer you to other specialists, including mental health, that have more direct knowledge, history & understanding of additional illnesses you experience. They will of course be keeping your referring medic up to date. Though in my experience this is usually by letter and in very general terms.
Where a decision made has been made on the strength of a GP report only or your mental health or any other health issue you feel has not been properly evaluated. You may want to consider the above.
Apparently my original DS1500 was supplied from the St. Peter's Clinic. This is worrying as I have never been to any clinic of that name and checking my copy of that document it is not mentioned. This being one of several errors that, as you can imagine, is generating more correspondence.
I also mentioned in my previous letter. An error made on the medical report submitted, no fault of my current consultant, relating to my date of diagnosis. I wrote asking for this data to be corrected under the obligations of the Data Protection Act. I also copied this to my clinic for correction. The response implies that the DWP will not be changing this. That I should write to my clinic. So whereas this has been done and the error raised and changed. The DWP will not be asking for another medical report nor changing existing data. A complaint to the Information Commissioners Office I think now.
As I am completing my DLA556 I am concerned that information I am providing is not being treated correctly or in fact that the information is accurate.
Thank you to all at the Feedback South London meeting on the 2nd May for the warm welcome & opportunity to mention the group ThCell & the efforts undertaken by the team with regard to the changes in the Benefits system.
If you live in South London please check out the website (http://feedbacksl.org.uk) to find out what they do and how you can get involved on matters about your care.
If you are a patient of the Kobler, Victoria or Nkosi Johnson Clinics. The patient forum, KVN Forum, is meeting on Tuesday 6th May 2008 from 6pm to 8pm. I understand that a person from the Terrence Higgins Trust has been invited to this meeting to give advice on the Disabiliy Living Allowance Review.
"Please note that we are hoping to have representation from Daniel Payet of THT, who will be presenting the THT approach to dealing with DLA review issues. ...... so if you know anyone who may wish to ask Daniel any questions in particular, then get them to come along, or bring those questions / issues with you - spread the word." - Chair, KVN Forum.
If you live in Dorking. James Purnell, Secretary of State, Department for Work & Pensions is on the panel of BBC's Question Time Thursday 8th May 2008. You can apply to be part of the audience by clicking here.
Only by building a body of evidence, your stories can we get a fuller picture of the impact.
Those of you that wrote to the editor of Positive Nation. I want you to understand, though your letter may not have been published, it has contributed to the body of evidence.